Back to Architecture Patterns
DataEnterprise

Data-Intensive Platform Architecture

When your competitive advantage is in your data, the platform that collects, transforms, stores, and surfaces that data is the most important thing you'll build.

May 2, 2026
|
3 topics covered
Discuss This Architecture
Data-Intensive Platform Architecture
Data
Category
Enterprise
Complexity
Healthcare, Financial Services
Industries
3+
Technologies

When You Need This

Your organization has data scattered across dozens of systems — CRM, ERP, billing, support tickets, sensor data, third-party APIs — and nobody can answer basic business questions without a week of manual data pulling. Reports are built in spreadsheets, analysts wait days for data engineering to prepare datasets, and the "single source of truth" is whichever database someone queried last. You need a data platform that ingests from all sources, transforms data into analysis-ready models, and serves insights to both dashboards and AI/ML systems. This isn't a data warehouse project — it's a platform that makes data a usable organizational asset.

Pattern Overview

Data-intensive platform architecture creates a unified data infrastructure spanning ingestion, storage, transformation, and consumption. The ingestion layer pulls data from operational databases (CDC), APIs, event streams, and file uploads into a centralized data lake (raw, unprocessed). The transformation layer (dbt, Spark, or custom) cleans, models, and aggregates data into a data warehouse (structured, query-optimized). The consumption layer serves data to BI dashboards, API endpoints, ML feature stores, and embedded analytics. Data governance, lineage tracking, and access control operate across all layers.

Reference Architecture

Data flows through a medallion architecture: Bronze (raw ingestion), Silver (cleaned and conformed), Gold (business-ready aggregates). The Bronze layer stores raw data in Parquet format on S3/GCS, partitioned by source and ingestion timestamp — nothing is dropped, nothing is transformed. The Silver layer applies schema enforcement, deduplication, type casting, and joins across sources — this is where data becomes consistent. The Gold layer contains business-specific aggregates, denormalized tables, and pre-computed metrics optimized for specific use cases (dashboards, ML training, API serving).

Core Components
  • Ingestion Layer: CDC connectors (Debezium, Fivetran, Airbyte) for database sources. API extractors for SaaS tools (Salesforce, HubSpot, Stripe). Event stream consumers for real-time data (Kafka). File processors for batch uploads (CSV, Excel, API dumps). All ingestion is incremental where possible, full-refresh only when necessary
  • Storage Layer: Object storage (S3/GCS) with Parquet/Delta Lake format for the data lake. Cloud data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift) for structured querying. The data lake holds everything (cheap, durable); the warehouse holds curated data (fast, expensive). Iceberg or Delta Lake table format for ACID transactions on the lake
  • Transformation Layer: dbt (data build tool) for SQL-based transformations — models are version-controlled, tested, and documented. Spark or Databricks for large-scale transformations that exceed SQL capabilities. Orchestrated by Airflow, Dagster, or Prefect with dependency-aware scheduling, automatic retries, and SLA monitoring
  • Data Governance: Column-level lineage tracking (what source field became what warehouse column). Access control with row-level security and column masking for PII. Data quality checks (Great Expectations, dbt tests) that block bad data from reaching the Gold layer. A data catalog (DataHub, Atlan) for discoverability

Design Decisions & Trade-offs

Data Lake vs. Data Warehouse vs. Lakehouse
Pure data lake (S3 + Parquet) is cheap and flexible but slow for interactive queries. Pure data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery) is fast for queries but expensive for storing everything. Lakehouse (Delta Lake, Iceberg on S3 + query engine) gives you both — lake economics with warehouse query performance. MW recommends the lakehouse pattern for new platforms: store everything in Delta Lake/Iceberg on S3, query through Snowflake/Databricks, and only duplicate to a traditional warehouse when query performance demands it.
dbt vs. Spark vs. Custom ETL
dbt for SQL-based transformations (which covers 80% of data engineering). Spark for heavy-lift transformations: large-scale joins, ML feature computation, unstructured data processing. Custom ETL (Python scripts) for edge cases that neither handles well (API calls within transformations, complex business logic). MW starts every engagement with dbt and only introduces Spark when a transformation demonstrably can't be expressed in SQL or exceeds SQL engine capabilities.
Batch vs. Streaming Ingestion
Batch (hourly/daily full or incremental loads) is simpler, cheaper, and sufficient for analytics that tolerate hourly freshness. Streaming (CDC via Debezium, real-time event consumers) is required when dashboards need minute-level freshness or downstream systems need near-real-time data sync. MW defaults to batch ingestion with CDC for the sources that need real-time, rather than streaming everything — the operational complexity of streaming pipelines isn't justified for sources where hourly freshness is fine.
Snowflake vs. BigQuery vs. Redshift
Snowflake for multi-cloud, separation of storage and compute, and the best cost model for variable workloads (auto-suspend, per-query scaling). BigQuery for GCP-native teams and workloads that benefit from serverless pricing (pay per query, not per cluster). Redshift for AWS-heavy organizations with steady, predictable query loads. MW has delivered on all three — the choice depends on existing cloud footprint, query patterns, and the team's SQL dialect preferences.
Data-Intensive Platform Architecture - System Architecture Diagram

System Architecture Overview

Technology Choices

LayerTechnologies
IngestionFivetran, Airbyte, Debezium, custom Python extractors, Kafka Connect
StorageS3/GCS (Parquet, Delta Lake, Iceberg), Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift
Transformationdbt, Apache Spark, Databricks, pandas (small-scale)
OrchestrationAirflow, Dagster, Prefect, dbt Cloud
GovernanceDataHub, Atlan, Great Expectations, dbt tests, Monte Carlo (observability)
ConsumptionMetabase, Looker, Superset, embedded analytics APIs, ML feature stores

When to Use / When to Avoid

Use WhenAvoid When
Data is scattered across 5+ systems and no one has a unified viewYou have one database and one dashboard — a direct connection is sufficient
Multiple teams (analysts, data scientists, product) need access to the same dataThe data volume is small (< 1GB) and doesn't justify platform overhead
Compliance requires data lineage, access control, and audit trails on data accessYou're building a transactional application, not an analytics platform
ML/AI features need curated, feature-store-ready datasetsThe organization doesn't have data engineering capacity to operate the platform

Our Approach

MW builds data platforms with a "quick-wins-first" approach — we identify the 3-5 most painful data questions the organization can't currently answer, build the minimum pipeline to answer them, and expand from there. We don't start with a 6-month "build the data lake" project. Our dbt projects include comprehensive testing (uniqueness, not-null, referential integrity, custom business rules), documentation (every model and column described), and freshness monitoring. We've built data platforms processing 50M+ rows/day for healthcare auditing, inventory management, and financial reporting — and the consistent lesson is that data quality controls are the hardest and most important part.

Related Blueprints

Related Case Studies

Related Technologies
Cloud SolutionsAI DevelopmentDigital Consulting

Need Help Implementing This Architecture?

Our architects can help design and build systems using this pattern for your specific requirements.

Get In Touch
Contact UsSchedule Appointment